Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Thoughts on the Seasons of Church Life

Mark Driscoll, pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle, WA posted an interesting article on The Resurgence site. I've re-posted it below and am curious about your impressions, thoughts (agree/ disagree?), and for those Memorial members reading, how you feel it relates to our church. Feel free to post comments below, shoot me an email- jeremy [at] mbcpa [dot] org... or let's talk when we get together next Sunday.

Churches go through critical seasons of their life that largely determine both their longevity and health. Seeing, accepting, and navigating these seasons is incredibly important for the ongoing forward progress of the gospel.
  • Gestation: In this phase, God calls a leader (or leaders) to begin a new church and begins to clarify the specifics of their vision. An initial core of people is gathered, a meeting location is secured, some ministries begin to form, and funding is acquired.
  • Birth: In this season, the church goes from being a concept to a reality, opens itself up to invite in the greater community, and focuses its attention on evangelism, growth, and implementation of new systems and leaders.
  • Infancy: In this season, the attendance settles into a somewhat stabilized pattern, longer-range planning begins, new programs are added, and administrative structures grow to prepare for numerical growth and evolving vision.
  • Adolescence: In this season, church attendees begin rising up into positions of greater leadership, church government begins to form, and church attendance and financial giving begin to increase.
  • Maturity: In this season, additional staff is added, the church gains confidence that it now has sufficient stability to exist indefinitely, church government and leadership are solidified, church attendance and giving become strong, and the church is now independent and able to self-govern and self-finance. It is also common for churches in this season to purchase their own facility.
  • Parenting: In this season, which ideally would be during the first year of the plant, the church is ready to reproduce itself by giving leadership and monies for the purpose of starting another gestation phase and repeating the church planting cycle. This results in the birth of a new congregation, likely in connection with other church planting churches networking together for the cause of church planting. The unique element here is that the church(es) sponsoring the new church plant have a vested interest in praying for and holding accountable the new work since they have directly sacrificed for it.
  • Grand-parenting: In this season, a church has planted enough churches that it begins to see third and fourth generation church plants birthed.
  • Death: In this season, a church is unhealthy and does not see conversion growth or attract young leaders. It thus faces a critical decision between two options. One, the church can deny its impending death, which may be many years out, sell off its assets such as land to prolong its death, redefine its mission to defend its death, and simply hold on as it slowly and painfully dies, often rewriting the best years of its history so as to feel significant and successful. Or two, the church can embrace its impending death as an opportunity to resurrect.
  • Resurrection: In this season, a church knows it is dying, or at least that it is not as healthy and fruitful as it should be, and humbly decides to shut down its organization and replant the church. This can be done by hiring a new entrepreneurial pastor to start over with the assets and with the freedom to kill programs, prune problem people, and decide whether to upgrade the facility, which is usually suffering from deferred maintenance, or sell it to use the money for a more strategic facility.
This can also be done by giving the facility and assets to a church planter or a growing church, which requires the dying church to be more concerned about the name of Jesus than its own name, and the Kingdom over its church. Those churches that have this humility and wisdom should be cheered as model churches for the majority of American churches that have plateaued or are declining and need to have a vision for a faithful and fruitful future.

1 comment:

AJ said...

I would differ with Pastor Driscoll on two fronts. Initially, I can't find any biblical foundations for such a modern-day analysis of the "life of a church". There is no such biblical model for a local church to necessarily follow such a path. Other than growth in the word, spiritual maturity, and the sending out of men called by God to carry the gospel (with the possibility of a church plant. We see the church of Jerusalem following no such model of death and resurrection. We never read of Paul's exhortation and instruction to any of the churches on how to accept there imposing age and death. The church is the expression of the eternal Kingdom of our Lord on earth awaiting her glorification, the bride waiting to be united with Christ, not a man that must age and die. We should expect life, and that more abundantly, provided we are in a biblical pursuit of a regenerate church membership. We must take care not to allow our subjective observations and experience to formulate our opinions, but rather the objective and careful study of the biblical model for the what the life of a church should look like.

Secondly, Mark does not allow for the repentance and restoration of a local body, only death - accept it with zeal or deny it and suffer a slow humiliating death, but with either approach, DIE. We see the opportunity of a loving Lord calling for the repentance of the seven churches in John's Revelation. Christ inviting the church to confess her sins and return to a vibrant relationship with Him. I would allow for a "Non-penitent Death or Repentance & Revival". Either or, not death by necessity.

There was an error in this gadget